Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I bought a house last year and the first thing I did was remove the Ring video doorbell. But if it hadn't been a company with an Amazon or Google type reputation I'd have at least tried using it for a while.


I would think the odds are much higher of a smaller company either a) selling your data to everyone that they can get money from, or b) just not having the tech skills to keep secure.

Note that I am not criticizing you not wanting to use it at all. Just curious that if it was another name, you would have been ok with it.


I think the point was that with Google or Amazon, you know what their real motive is. With another product, they might actually just be selling a security camera.


This feels tautological. And I've seen too many crap security features in nursery cameras to really have faith in small camera companies. :(


Maybe you're right that the odds that another company could be trusted are low enough not to be a distinction compared to companies I know I don't trust.

That said, I mind signing up for throwaway services less because it's easy to use a fake name/email, which is becoming less an option for the major services, who try to enforce real identities and revoke accounts without consequences.


The throw away account point sounds fair. I hadn't necessarily considered that.

I was just going off the larger number of password dumps there are out there. Most are from small companies.


I don't know about that. Amazon and Google have a decent track record of being bad about data privacy, and the size of a company by itself says nothing about that company's expertise.


I checked a while back, and there are at least a couple of smart video doorbells that can be made to work with a local IPTV system. I didn't end up doing it[0], but it does seem possible.

[0]- I wanted to monitor for deliveries, but COVID kind of trivialized that for a year.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: