Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

That kind of argumentation tends not to hold up in court, and for good reason. If the f---ing White House reaches out to your company and makes a polite request, it is NOT a good idea to ignore that request. Because, you know, the implication.

The courts tend to hold up this view that when there is such a massively asymmetric power relationship, like there is here, then even a polite request is really a demand. No reasonable company beholden to its shareholders could justify pushing back against the highest levels of the executive branch.



If the f---ing White House reaches out to your company and makes a polite request ...

Evidence of any such request?

Because, you know, the implication.

Evidence of any implication?

No demand, no request, no coercion, no implication, no case.


From TFA:

> the Biden administration has admitted that it is giving Facebook a list of accounts to censor for spreading "disinformation" about the Covid-19 response.


TFA makes an unfounded accusation. Using TFA as proof is circular logic.

Yes, the Biden administration has admitted giving medical info/advice to Facebook.

Any associated request or demand is unproven accusation. For all we know, Facebook requested their input.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: