Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

We actually do have auto-refreshed content standardised. <frame> instead of <section>, and <meta http-equiv="refresh" content="60; https://foo.bar/example-section" /> (where the URL to refresh from is optional).

The web could do all the things we really needed it to (except embedded video and games), a long time ago. But programmers wanted more natural ways of doing it, which converted a document format into an application framework into an operating system.



Yeah you're correct what i had in mind as more like dynamically loading new articles, for example for a webchat. Not "refreshing" as in reloading the whole iframe. Like built-in RSS but using semantic HTML.

> But programmers wanted more natural ways of doing it, which converted a document format into an application framework into an operating system.

I think it's more like hostile actors (including Microsoft itself) had so much of the market share that trying to standardize things was perceived as a lot of effort without success, despite lots of people trying. JS was the worst we could come up with, but everybody supported it more or less...


> Yeah you're correct what i had in mind as more like dynamically loading new articles, for example for a webchat.

Oh, you mean chunked transfer encoding? Yeah, we've got that too.

> I think it's more like hostile actors

The hostile actors had to get the ideas from somewhere.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: