Does anyone have any insight into how the justices are educated about a case like this? I guess this applies to many cases, involving a variety of industries, but it's especially clear here that making a decision requires a technical understanding of the stakes. How are the justices made to understand what the different concepts meant? from reading the ruling it's clear that they have a very good understanding, and it's impressive for non-programmers, most of whom are older and did not grow up with technology.