Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Permanent storage is a harder problem than many people give credit: it costs money for storage and for access. When you have a little bit of data used by a few people, you can probably find volunteers on the internet who will donate capacity but that falls apart once a service becomes popular enough that people have expectations of reliability or support. It also becomes legally a minefield the first time someone puts copyrighted or illegal material there, so nodes are going to become selective about what fraction of the total they mirror.

This seems like a challenge for artwork since blockchains are so inefficient compared to the alternatives and for any one person it's both cheaper and more reliable to store their collection on a regular storage service which has SLAs. Why pay more to take on other people's problems?



Totally agree! My point was that although you can solve long term storage with tech and there are projects who can try to solve the problem, with all the caveats you mentioned, there is no way technically to solve the artwork provenance part. You have to assign to an individual or team to go through drills.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: