A bit off-topic, but do you think that's the right approach? A niche field like that can be really good for a company, and if you want to broach another field, don't you think it's a good idea to start a separate brand and image for that field instead of generalizing away from your niche?
McDonald's bought Chipotle but didn't rename it "McDonald's", neither did they rename McDonald's Chiptole. McDonald's is for hamburgers and Chipotle is for burritos even if the money ends up in the hands of the same people.
It is almost never beneficial to merge existing brands (unless one of the brands has a horrible reputation), so why should someone generalize away from a successful niche application and lose the associated branding instead of just starting a new brand for the new field?
McDonald's bought Chipotle but didn't rename it "McDonald's", neither did they rename McDonald's Chiptole. McDonald's is for hamburgers and Chipotle is for burritos even if the money ends up in the hands of the same people.
It is almost never beneficial to merge existing brands (unless one of the brands has a horrible reputation), so why should someone generalize away from a successful niche application and lose the associated branding instead of just starting a new brand for the new field?