Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I don't understand why this doesn't get more discussion. It's a much more conservative step than "medicare for all" and would do a lot of good.


As I understand it, you need collective bargaining against insurers to keep individual premiums down. Employers do that today, and if employers just pay out their insurance spend to employees, the employees will get less insurance as a result. A single payer system means the government negotiates on behalf of all of the citizens, allowing it to keep costs down much more than our current system.


Or you mandate that the insurers can only rate on certain variables (e.g. zip code) and/or you mandate a pooling system so that insurers who have many low risk people on their books subsidise insurers who have many high risk people.


Right, there are other solutions, but "just cut the insurance check to employees" isn't a good option for employees.


It has no clear advantages over M4A, and the critical problem is it has no cost-control consequence.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: