Two things that I'd need explained to trust this take:
"Often, the data are in the hands of Democrat politicians and bureaucrats who refuse to make it available."
1) The Georgia SOS in charge of elections is a Republican, so why would it benefit him to work against the Republican Nominee
2) If the data is being held by Democrats who refuse to make it available, what "data" did The Epoch Times analyze that showed votes being removed?
In my experience, stuff like this often boils down to people's lack of understanding of systems or practices and they read into "anomalies" that might look weird to an uneducated outsider, but for someone that knows what they're talking about, isn't sinister...
1) The Georgia SOS in charge of elections is a Republican, so why would it benefit him to work against the Republican Nominee
2) If the data is being held by Democrats who refuse to make it available, what "data" did The Epoch Times analyze that showed votes being removed?
In my experience, stuff like this often boils down to people's lack of understanding of systems or practices and they read into "anomalies" that might look weird to an uneducated outsider, but for someone that knows what they're talking about, isn't sinister...