the left portends to have authoritative insight over the intent of others... based only on their biased perception or desire. And that is precisely the problem.

You just did it to me.

The media does it depending on whether they want "mostly peaceful protests march" or "attempted violent coup."

There is no honest way to suggest that the events of this week are comparable to the events surrounding the protesting of appointments.

I will note however, that you're subtly changing the topic when you change your argument from the protests about the appointment of a judge to the "mostly peaceful protests".

Again, this is bad faith. You are just moving the goal posts to try and suite your argument.

Edit: I conflated the womens march with the protest about the appointment of scotus judge.

This is beyond bad faith, this is an open "fuck you" to anyone that dares participate in this discussion. To shut it down, to make any sort of dialogue impossible.

And you say the left wants to censor, what a laugh.

Your state of denial and victimhood complex make any discussion impossible.

There are many (most) cases whataboutism is merely an excuse or distraction, but here, it's the very basis of the ongoing argument.

That most of the left doesn't even realize this is a big part of the problem.

next sentence:

> one women who came a little too close to breaking into where some VIPs were was shot in the neck and died

the shot heard round the trailer park!

As if smashing doors and climbing through them while armed guards tell you not to with congress fleeing on the other side is not "directly threatened".

The absurdity of these arguments is astounding. What's worse, they seem to be thinking that they are making sense and that there is some global conspiracy on the left to "silence them".

The rest of the world is standing in awe and shock at the US.