Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Which is how it ends up structured to benefit the bankers.

People who only do something once or twice are more likely to defer to the 'experts', the only problem is the experts have their own incentives that are not directly aligned. The experts are also really good at selling since that's mostly their job so it makes it even harder to go against the grain.

I get why founders do it, but I think it's a mistake. Founders are also usually pretty good at first principles thinking and risk taking. DPO is also pretty solid ground now that a few companies have done it.

> "Eh, would you really though?"

Impossible to know, but I think so? After you're worth 5+ Billion it's more about money you can leverage via your company to grow and build. I think personal wealth has diminishing returns a bit before that point. Losing out on that much money for the company would irritate me.

There's a funny story (I searched briefly, but couldn't find) that when Elon took Tesla public via an IPO and the bankers told him the initial price he just said "no, at least $XX or no deal". I think the bank price was $17 and he said at least $19, but I could be off on the numbers. They did his price and that price was still too low.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: