Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Also, SARS was classified BSL3 to allow more labs to study it. The Wuhan lab is a BSL4-certified one, which have much lower leakage risk by design.



I mean, none of them should leak.

With that said, the Wuhan lab had both BSL-2 and BSL-3 units studying bat coronaviruses before the pandemic [1]. After the COVID pandemic hit the PRC mandated all COVID research be carried out in BSL-3+ conditions; the research they're doing at the moment on COVID happens to be done in their BSL-4 facility but only because of lack of sufficient resources in their BSL-3 facility; that's likely temporary [2].

I'm not sure why a secondary leak after a pandemic already began would be just fine though.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wuhan_Institute_of_Virology

[2] https://www.sciencemag.org/sites/default/files/Shi%20Zhengli...


> With that said, the Wuhan lab had both BSL-2 and BSL-3 units studying bat coronaviruses before the pandemic [1].

That's interesting indeed. Thanks.

> I mean, none of them should leak.

In theory, there's no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is.

BSL-3 shouldn't leak, yet we don't put super scary viruses in there, because we know the probability it could happen isn't that low.

> I'm not sure why a secondary leak after a pandemic already began would be just fine though.

Fine isn't the word. It's still an industrial accident, but not necessarily a catastrophe. Do we even have an example of such leak that would have triggered an epidemic in the vicinity of the lab?


> I mean, none of them should leak.

That's not easy to say. "Leaking" can be as simple as a researcher catching COVID outside the lab and then spreading it to a coworker who then spreads it outside the lab.




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2025 batch! Applications are open till Aug 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: