Here's a better title: "Private company where a large chunk of public discussion happens get to push a certain political agenda and decide what's true and what's not".
>These stable packages just postpone the inevitable technological debt and when you have to pay the debt, it's too late.
Easy or not [1], it's not the business of a video to do the differentation in behalf of the citizenry.
Not to mention that it being "easy" is a naive assumption, by people who feel that it's only the "other bad side" that's affected, which even if it was true, is something that can turn around on a dime based on the political climate, changing corpoate interests, etc)
