No that's not what it means. It means 2-6 were rejected.
"Signature matching" is a junk process and should be ignored.
In the AZ random sampling that the Judge asked for, 6/100 signatures were inconclusive, and this was on verified voters.
> Can you expend on how the process works in Australia. Genuinely curious.
https://www.aec.gov.au/faqs/postal-voting.htm
You control the voting envelopes and ballot papers which is actually how fraud is controlled in the US too. The signature verification thing is nothing but ineffective security theatre.
No that's not what it means. It means 2-6 were rejected.
"Signature matching" is a junk process and should be ignored.
In the AZ random sampling that the Judge asked for, 6/100 signatures were inconclusive, and this was on verified voters.
> Can you expend on how the process works in Australia. Genuinely curious.
https://www.aec.gov.au/faqs/postal-voting.htm
You control the voting envelopes and ballot papers which is actually how fraud is controlled in the US too. The signature verification thing is nothing but ineffective security theatre.