Millions of people believe the election was rigged in the US. This is a total failure of building trust in elections, regardless weather its true or not.
I personally believe in "Trust but Verify". There is no way to verify this election. The process is made impossible, because signature check was not done on mail in ballots in any meaningful way. And has not been done now either in any of the recounts. We only know that currently 0.02% of ballots were rejected vs 6% previous elections.
To my common sense, this election could have been spammed with mail in ballots, and almost everything accepted. No meaningful signature match was performed, when only 0.02% of ballots were rejected.
It's lies. It's all lies. You're reading lies and choosing to believe them[1]. So is it any wonder that Youtube is thinking that maybe they shouldn't have a hand in spreading those lies?
[1] As proven by your reply that the link does not "prove a lie"! That's not the way the burden of proof works. You are choosing to believe this categorical statement given to you without support. That is a "lie" in the vernacular.
The fact check does not prove a lie. At most it proves that Trump is not making the statement based on publicly available data. Since the final rejection rate for 2020 have not yet been released.
From the fact check:
"Georgia rejected 6.42% of mail-in ballots in total in the 2016 general election "
"The higher percentage he mentions for past years is likely based off the total rejected ballots (here) which can not be compared with 2020, as this information is not available."
This site seem have the most up to date numbers.
"Rejected absentee/mail-in ballots as a percentage of total absentee/mail-in ballots returned, 2016-2020"
The Reuters link specifically addresses that: it's a tabulation error, the older data shows ballots rejected for all causes, the 2020 data is limited to those rejected for signature mismatches only, they haven't released the all-cause number yet. And the signature rejection numbers broadly match up, both being sub-1%.
I mean if you even tried to use logic you could understand why there would be drastically less rejected mail in ballots then normal years. There were massive information campaigns about how to correctly fill out ballots and the things to be careful of leading up to this election because millions of people were going to be voting by mail this year. In previous years there is 0 information about it at all. Also most people learned about the mistakes when their ballots got rejected in the primary.
I don't think you could get 99.98% of people to tie their shoes correctly. Let alone fill out a paper ballot, and match their signatures. Have you ever worked with below average intelligence people?
I personally believe in "Trust but Verify". There is no way to verify this election. The process is made impossible, because signature check was not done on mail in ballots in any meaningful way. And has not been done now either in any of the recounts. We only know that currently 0.02% of ballots were rejected vs 6% previous elections.
To my common sense, this election could have been spammed with mail in ballots, and almost everything accepted. No meaningful signature match was performed, when only 0.02% of ballots were rejected.