If your world view is this simplistic, then you can argue anything.
> The law also blocks county election officials from rejecting absentee ballots because of mismatched signatures, and when information on a voter registration application doesn't match other government databases, the voter will remain on the rolls. [0]
It's not really "simplistic" to judiciously apply Occam's razor to extraordinary claims.
And what exactly is your claim? It's just not plausible that there was such a large amount of voter fraud in key states (a net of hundreds of thousands of fraudulent votes for Biden. How many fraud votes for Trump are we willing to allow in this scenario?) and no tangible evidence for any of it. You have claim after claim from "internet sleuths" who think they saw something on video, but so far, it seems that all of these claims have only shown ignorance of the viewer (ballot curing being an example I saw).
And I'm not sure what point you're making with your link. Can you explain?
> The law also blocks county election officials from rejecting absentee ballots because of mismatched signatures, and when information on a voter registration application doesn't match other government databases, the voter will remain on the rolls. [0]
That didn't age well...
[0]: https://www.npr.org/2019/04/04/709911541/georgia-governor-si...