Your intuition is pretty good.
A correct proof of inferential incompleteness of Russell's
Principia Mathematica can be constructed using the
computational undecidability of the halting problem.
See https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3603021
However, the [Gödel 1931] proof is incorrect for reasons mentioned elsewhere in this discussion.
Your intuition is pretty good.
A correct proof of inferential incompleteness of Russell's
Principia Mathematica can be constructed using the
computational undecidability of the halting problem.
See https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3603021