Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I saw that comment in a couple different places. Presumably Chrome is running through Rosetta 2, whereas Safari is native to the M1. I imagine once Chrome is available natively, performance will be somewhat better, though probably still not as good as Safari.



On the new machines yes, but none if the people you read about before today had AS machines, they were all comparing Chrome and Safari on Intel, so it’s unlikely that stays quiet will change once Chrone is native on AS.


Actually, I think it will. The M1 chip takes a lot smaller proportion of power of the laptop to run (compared to say, the LCD, ssd, etc). If the new macbook air idles at 6W and runs chrome at 10W with no fan, people are barely gonna notice. That’s a big difference compared to an intel machine running chrome at 35+ watts.


I was referring to multiple reviews of new Apple hardware, just to clarify.


IIRC Chrome is a battery hog / memory hog on all platforms.

Am I wrong in this regard?


Afaik it's a memory hog but it doesn't really use more or less battery then other browsers.


so it uses more memory but not more battery?


That's...not a contradiction?




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2025 batch! Applications are open till Aug 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: