Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Presumably they multiplied the probability of this occurring with the damage caused and decided that it was lower than the benefit of the high-trust society.


I don’t understand - don’t they have legal obligations to protect? Saying ‘but we trusted’ won’t work in a court.


Sure, but the court won't make them pay unbounded damages.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: