Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

>"It's meant to be a living document, right? "

The constitution was not originally intended to be a 'living' document; that theory came about in the progressive era as a way to change the meaning of the constitution without amending it.[1]

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Living_Constitution



I meant living document in the prosaic sense, of document meant to be regularly updated. The amendment process is baked in from the start, so was clearly intended from the beginning.


Originalists are usually in favor of more frequent amendments to the constitution, they're only against re-interpreting existing text in new ways.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: