Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Holy cow, that's true. New 2020 Mini with a 16GB RAM, seriously?



Especially head scratching when you consider that a lot of folks still have 2012 Mac minis with 16GB of RAM.

I think 16GB is the bare minimum for a professional machine. Apple clears the bar here, but doesn't exceed it.

Maybe next year's machines? As a first product, I think it's good enough. And the performance gains elsewhere--if what Apple says is true--are actually pretty radically impressive.


It's possible to do development on 8 GB, you just can't use Electron apps.


To be fair, most of us doing dev on our machines probably have a Slack client or Mattermost app floating in the background.

...And we might even be doing dev in something like VS Code in the first place.

We all like to dunk on Electron, but it's kind of become part of the furniture at this point, for better our worse.


Maybe we could use the iPad version of Slack for better efficiency.


This is really great point, and does highlight a key advantage of Apple Silicon going forward. This kind of thing will now be an option going forward on Apple's new computers, in a way it wasn't before.


Yeah, until Slack throws a fit and decides that desktop users don't deserve to use it.


You can avoid Electron if you try hard enough. I use Slack through a native client, for example; before that I was using browser tabs.


Try hard enough, haha. I don't have a single Electron app, and yet have never purposely avoided them either.


Which native client? Slack for desktop is Electron.



I'm not stupid dude, I know there are ways to avoid it.

Sometimes they're not worth it. Electron's existence itself is proof of "sometimes it's not worth it."


I'm learning Flutter on my Windows 10 desktop. I have Android studio and the emulator open, and Firefox, Chromium and Brave opened.

Total 14G of ram. My combined browser ram use is about 3G. The flutter project is barely 20 lines of code. The PC was started up about 2h ago.

I'd feel much better with 32G on a dev machine (to be fair, my .net projects require much less ram than this).


Three browsers open is not a requirement for the vast majority of folks.

There are probably a number of useless Windows services that could be shut down as well.


Three browsers open is not a requirement for the vast majority of folks.

Every developer who makes frontend things for the web should have a minimum of three browsers (Chrome, Firefox, Safari, but maybe others as well) open any time they're testing or debugging their code. That's quite a lot of developers.


Nah, most of us go browser by browser I think. I think I've been going with two browsers open at most the last 5 years, and at my current employer I'm so reliant on browserstack that I don't even have anything other than chrome running.


And 16GB is fine for that. That's not what is taking the majority of the grandparents ram.


I have 1500 tabs open in Firefox, plus CLion, PyCharm, a few Jupyter kernels eating 5-15G, a few apps running in background - it’s often nearing 32G on a 32G 7-year old Mac and sometimes goes into swap space. I personally won’t consider anything less than 128G as a main machine at this point (and it’s a pity that you can’t swap upgradable RAM on iMacs for 256G).


That's a little radical...

People used to tell me that Java development was resource consuming... But I somehow manage to build systems with 16GB. I didn't even go for 32G on my new laptop.


...Can I ask why you have 1500 tabs open?


Stuff that’s easier to keep as open tabs (in a tree format via TreeStyleTab) and eventually close those trees when they are no longer needed, as opposed to bookmarking everything and eventually accumulating a bajillion of irrelevant bookmarks. E.g., I’m doing house renovation so I might have a good few hundred tabs open just on that topic which will eventually get closed.


On most browsers you can organize bookmarks in folders/tree structures. You could then delete folders/trees of bookmarks at a time, eliminating this "accumulating a bajillion of irrelevant bookmarks".


I know. Been there, done that. To each his own, I guess. An open tab is an open tab, if I close it, it's gone forever unless I bookmark it which I would very rarely do. A bookmark is an inverse, it's going to stay there forever unless you clean it up and manually delete it. In my experience, a few hundred more open tabs beats ten thousand dead bookmarks, and closing tabs is easier than cleaning up bookmarks.


Tabs being "open" doesn't mean they're loaded into ram.


Atom, Chrome and Firefox on a 2017 8GB 13" MBP - no issues in using it for development.

I upgraded it only because my keyboard died.


I guess I mean more that if you're going to buy a brand new dev machine in 2020, you shouldn't buy anything with less than 16GB of RAM.

You can still be productive right this moment on 8GB of RAM (you're proving it!), but the march of time will inevitably start to make that amount feel less and less tolerable, if it isn't already.

Personally, when I buy a dev machine, I'm generally trying to look at the next few years of ownership. Will 8GB of RAM cut it in 2023? Doubtful. 16GB? Yeah, a little safer. But 32GB would make me feel better.


What kind of development? Firefox, Spotify, Slack, WhatsApp, any JetBrains IDE, an iOS Simulator, and an Android Simulator will have my 16GB MBP swapping like crazy.


I run a few Electron apps daily within 4GB RAM, it's (fine - 1); =~ almost fine lol.


They’re not advertising any 16Gb models on their web site. It’s all 8Gb. Which you’re not going to be able to upgrade.

I’m out


You can choose 16Gb for +$200.


Ah yes just seen that.

8Gb of RAM for £200 they can piss off. I paid £240 for 64Gb of decent stuff in my desktop.


This is super interesting. I personally wouldn’t consider a 8GB or 16GB laptop this year as my daily driver, but it’s true that the performance gain from extra RAM beyond 8GB is marginal, especially for average audiences and especially when their performances are measured only externally.

Like, you might get super frustrated, develop mental health issues, not that the corporate cares. Expenditure reduces, ROI might even slightly improve, why bother then?


> you might get super frustrated, develop mental health issues

Uh, what? Is your comment literally "because I don't have enough RAM in my computer my mental health will decline"?


Yes, literally?

I’m talking about 4GB DDR4 non-SSD Office machines still in production that are borderline crime against humanity.


But you were just talking about 8 GB machines with fast SSDs…


you have to admit when you're in a busy day w/ looming deadlines and your machine starts chugging coz it can't handle the excel docs/dev work going on it feels like the worst thing ever.

the kinda company that can't afford to give you the latest stuff is more likely to have those kindsa days all the time too so it feels even worse. management even rides your ass coz you can't make it work...

part of "making it" as a software dev in a lot of countries is getting a machine per your specs not having a machine specced out to you by IT.


My 100 Chrome tabs easily consume 8GB




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2025 batch! Applications are open till Aug 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: