Of all possible responses to the GP, I think yours is the dumbest and least helpful. You've combined two strawmen, a false choice, and the least charitable interpretation of the GP into a single brain-dead one-liner.
The "economy" you speak of is not merely investment income for wealthy people, or whatever other expendable construct you made for yourself. It is our livelihoods. It's how we feed our children, provide shelter, education, security, and hope for the future. A destroyed economy destroys lives, and carries as many or even more risks to our physical and mental health as does the virus itself.
I'm someone who cares about people. The choice is not simply between the elderly and the economy, and we have enough tools and resources such that we don't have to sacrifice any group for any other. But if your strawman + false-choice were our reality, your priorities are fucked up. If, theoretically, you'd be willing to sacrifice the health and wellbeing of the vast majority of the worlds population to whom this virus is no more a threat than a severe seasonal flu, to preserve the few reamining years or months of life for the "elderly" (whatever that means to you), I would honestly feel justified in calling you heartless and irrational.
The "economy" you speak of is not merely investment income for wealthy people, or whatever other expendable construct you made for yourself. It is our livelihoods. It's how we feed our children, provide shelter, education, security, and hope for the future. A destroyed economy destroys lives, and carries as many or even more risks to our physical and mental health as does the virus itself.
I'm someone who cares about people. The choice is not simply between the elderly and the economy, and we have enough tools and resources such that we don't have to sacrifice any group for any other. But if your strawman + false-choice were our reality, your priorities are fucked up. If, theoretically, you'd be willing to sacrifice the health and wellbeing of the vast majority of the worlds population to whom this virus is no more a threat than a severe seasonal flu, to preserve the few reamining years or months of life for the "elderly" (whatever that means to you), I would honestly feel justified in calling you heartless and irrational.