I'm current enrolled in the Oregon State post-bacc CS degree program and I've heard great things about the class that this book is written for. Hopefully by the time I get around to my electives the professor is still teaching this class.
It's often good to have different POV when learning cryptography. These seem to complement each other nicely, with Boneh and Shoup being more advanced, and more complete in many areas.
Has anyone read this text and can comment on how good it is? I've been wanting to learn more about cryptography as a SWE who's mostly only done traditional web apps/microservices.
This is great! I'm bookmarking it, I'll probably use some stuff in my sequel to the "Practical Cryptography" course I just released: https://qvault.io/practical-cryptography/
When I first read this, I had the (snarky! unfiltered!) thought, "Well why dontcha go Google it? That's not exactly a philosophical question."
But that got me thinking... what if it was a philosophical question, the kind of question that prompts responses that tell you what it's really like to work in [x].
HN, what's it really like to work in [Distributed systems, ML/AI, Crypto]?
HN will have the inside scoop. For example, the salary increase when moving from generic SWE to ML engineer. Or backend engineer to Netflix scale distributed systems.
As someone with domain expertise in both distributed systems and crypto, I'll say "not crypto"; it's relatively well-understood and most of the people who get value out of it don't need to work on it, they can just use what already exists. By comparison, one needs detailed knowledge of distributed systems to make effective use of them, so expertise has broader value. I suspect ML/AI is similar to distributed systems in impact and value, maybe with broader market applicability, but I don't know as much about it in practice.
I love this site a lot. The fun thing is that, the missing of TLS connection will allow people to tamper this site which teaches people how to prevent tampering :)
>In particular, never ever write(x^a)(x^b)=x^ab. If you write this, your cryptography instructor will realize that life is too short, immediately resign from teaching, and join a traveling circus. But not before changing your grade in the course to a zero.
Slightly unrelated:
Can we have the cake and eat too in the case of choosing
e-book formats for academic e-books?
I mean to combine the adaptiveness of epub and the advanced scientific notation and plotting possible with pdf.
I'm currently taking a graduate class in Applied Cryptography and will definitely use this as another resource for reference. Love that they've opened it up and made it free.
If you want to see the syllabus for the class it's available here: https://oregonstate.instructure.com/courses/1761126/assignme...