A number of people here pointed out that the writer's original claim to be false positive proof simply because he'd used the tool for a long time was ridiculous. Unfortunately for him he's learning this the hard way.
"The findings are false-positive proof since I have used the tool that discovered it for six years now and I am yet to see it misidentify an item throughout the years."
"The findings are false-positive proof since I have used the tool that discovered it for six years now and I am yet to see it misidentify an item throughout the years."