If you believe the story, the people who are pointed to were already being looked for for arrest. Don't buy the poor innocent narrative too quickly.
It just happens that their last actions affected powerful figures and the US government so they might actually be some real international effort to arrest them now.
People's home addresses and names should not be released to the public until a legal conviction has been ascertained. This has nothing to do with "innocent narrative". It has everything to do with due process, which is a foundation many countries entire law systems are founded upon.
The legal process is innocent until proven guilty. You seem to be advocating for guilty until proven innocent, with a side of public vigilante justice as the punishment.
If doxxing innocent (reminder: you are innocent until /proven/ guilty) people is the norm... And allowing vigilante justice is okay... We are in a very dangerous place.
You don't have to look far for numerous cases of innocent people having their lives ruined, or sometimes literally snuffed out, due to situations exactly like this.
Doxxing is not a crime, that's my point. And I am in no way interested in making it one. Innocent people should remain innocent until proven guilty and the rest of our god-forsaken species should figure out how to grow up and treat people with compassion and respect.
If what Krebs is doing in this case impacts the dude in any tangible and negative way he should sue Krebs for liable. That would be interesting.
It just happens that their last actions affected powerful figures and the US government so they might actually be some real international effort to arrest them now.