Comcast serving everyone. Planned Parenthood not turning away any customer. Airlines allow anybody to fly.

All three of those examples are insanely political enterprises.

You basically showed your lack of awareness by answering the question.

I think you're intentionally missing the point here. Sure, all business are affected by politics, but in the context of this article, none of these generally limit services based on political ideologies.

No, you don't understand that the following is a massively significant political position:

> [not] limit[ing] services based on political ideologies.

I also wish we had a functioning democracy and those were still apolitical.

Selling lemonade, running a bike shop, etc.

There are permits required to run a lemonade stand and a bike shop. Who do you think sets the rules for those permits?

Again though that's an example of being affected by politics, not participating in it.

Sales at the lemonade stand are affected by weather, but that doesn't mean that the owner should immediately start building a climate-changing machine.

> There are permits required to run a lemonade stand and a bike shop.

I get the lemonade stand, but who needs a permit to run a bike shop?

You've never actually opened and ran a bike shop have you?

Even just the zoning, taxes and permitting process alone will be political.

I'm loving seeing all these responses. They're hilarious.

There's no difference except size. Facebook and Google were small businesses once.

That’s the argument imo.

That if you took Apple, Google, Facebook and started them today under appropriately matches circumstances... they would all either be purchased for meager amounts or put out of business.

I believe in free markets, but also monopoly wrangling. FAANG will absolutely work against the very landscapes they came up in.