You're moving the goalposts. You originally were talking about the risks of vaccinating kids and young adults, and saying that the vaccine had to be better than 1/100k. Now you're saying concerned about insufficiently tested vaccines. These are completely different issues, but you're trying to muddy the water.
Of course no one wants to take a vaccine that didn't undergo proper clinical trials. The argument was whether a vaccine that had typical side effect ratios would be ethical.
Of course no one wants to take a vaccine that didn't undergo proper clinical trials. The argument was whether a vaccine that had typical side effect ratios would be ethical.