Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

>>> They already have a mobile chip that is as fast as an active-thermally cooled notebook chip.

>> "As fast" on specific curated use cases. Show me an Apple chip that beats any laptop on 7zip.

> Is this a joke, what kind of usage benchmark is 7zipping large numbers of files?

A benchmark that Apple is unlikely to have implemented specific optimizations for, which therefore is a better test of the general purpose performance of the chip.

The situation being claimed here is sort of like if someone cited a DES benchmark to claim that Deep Crack's DES cracking chips (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EFF_DES_cracker) were faster than a contemporary 1998 Pentium II.



A benchmark that probably relies as much on disk access speeds as CPU?


Nope, 7zip is using LZMA algorithm for compression, which is around a few MB/s on the fastest CPU. It's heavily CPU bound.

edit: Just tried compressing a large file, ultra setting on my desktop i5 CPU, it's running at 3 MB/s on 1 core.


Apple ships a framework for doing lzma and other compression algorithms. I doubt they will be taken by surprise


One large file could be CPU bound, many small files (which is partly why you zip/jar things up) is disk bound.


Not true. the bottleneck is going to be compression not disk access.


> A benchmark that probably relies as much on disk access speeds as CPU?

If true, that's just a nitpick that doesn't affect the overall point of the GGGP, though.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: