>One problem with your argument (from a political perspective) is that it undermines the entire system of mandatory disclosures (for drug warnings, investor relations, real estate, etc.).

Is this a bug or a feature?

>as they are based on the idea that consumers can and should read lengthy, confusing documents.

The resolution of such lawsuits are based around the notion that consumers should be able to read such documentations. The law suits themselves are about a deeper issue of consent. I would see this action as nullifying the resolutions but not the problem. It is unjust, but to the consumers.