Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Well that’s how they got the Challenger disaster.

Reused booster ruptured under improper launch criteria revised for management and public relations reasons.

Would it have been okay if it weren’t for the wrong go? Maybe, but still the potato quality refurbishment of flown boosters could have done it sooner or later.



Do you have any more details on the booster being refurbished having any impact on Challenger?


Search for "Shuttle Seal Erosion" A brief summary is here: https://books.google.ch/books?id=XsuqDwAAQBAJ&pg=PT56&lpg=PT...

Edit: This one is better: https://space.stackexchange.com/questions/17321/did-the-chal...


AFAIK the SRBs were made in segments to make them rail transportable from the factory (in a state with a friendly congressman ;-)) to the launch pad. There should be pictures of the segments being transported on rail from that one time the train derailed due to trestle collapsing under it.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: