Why don't you use Erlang? Its much closer to you definition of OOP. | Hacker News

Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

login

nickik on March 17, 2011 | parent | context | favorite | on: Don't distract new programmers with OOP

Why don't you use Erlang? Its much closer to you definition of OOP.

Ingaz on March 17, 2011 [–]

Exactly.

And I think that Erlang is most closest to Kay's definition of OOP. (If we can drop "Everything is object")

Erlang processes are objects.

Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!
Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact