You mean, an crypto library exported by the framework instead of you specifically importing it? I don't see the gain (as a consequence, I have no idea if other frameworks do that).
RoR and Django both have extensible management commands, and all frameworks that I have ever seen allow you to create independent CLI commands (it's on PHP that the CLI is a second class citizen).
I think having good, secure, easy to use and hard to misuse crypto makes a ton of sense for any framework. The framework needs these internally anyway (to offer encrypted sessions for example), so you might as well expose them to the developer too.
I might have missed it, but I couldn't find any documentation on how to create custom commands in RoR. For Django I found [1] (through "python manage.py" from what I understand) and that does look like it's more or less the same as Laravel's "php artisan", with commands provided by the framework as well as the ability to add your own.
Anyway, I wasn't trying to attack RoR or Django, as those are actually the best alternatives to Laravel I know of. I worked on an existing Django project for a bit and while I don't like Python, Django seemed just fine to me for the most part. I did want to express my disagreement when it comes to the original claim of "any framework in any language can do what PHP frameworks can do" though.
> I did want to express my disagreement when it comes to the original claim of "any framework in any language can do what PHP frameworks can do" though.
Oh, a complete agreement on that.
This conversation sidelined from some people talking about Java, .Net, Go and Rust. None have anything similar to the big web frameworks. And while I'm not completely sure about Rust, I do believe that none even can have it.
RoR and Django both have extensible management commands, and all frameworks that I have ever seen allow you to create independent CLI commands (it's on PHP that the CLI is a second class citizen).