> A contract killer is also responding to market forces. Sometimes people are willing to pay for things we don't want to allow them, and we judge (and punish) the people who provide them.
I'm not taking a position on monstrosity, or lack there of, but the reasoning provided seems flawed.
The reasoning was provided in context.
It's reasonable to strip a murderer of their physical freedom - it's unreasonable for anyone to do it to you unless you are a murderer.
You would agree that your neighbors or even you are ordering regularly from Amazon, yes?
In other words, your neighbors or even you are explicitly condoning the processes adopted by Amazon, yes?
The reasoning was provided in that context.
If your neighbors are regularly engaging the services of a contract killer, I would perhaps, move.
The reasoning was provided in context.
It's reasonable to strip a murderer of their physical freedom - it's unreasonable for anyone to do it to you unless you are a murderer.
You would agree that your neighbors or even you are ordering regularly from Amazon, yes?
In other words, your neighbors or even you are explicitly condoning the processes adopted by Amazon, yes?
The reasoning was provided in that context.
If your neighbors are regularly engaging the services of a contract killer, I would perhaps, move.