Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Can you explain?

My recollection is that there was too much squabbling within the Democrat party to achieve it, with moderates wavering.

And with the Senate putting in a watered down public option, it killed any chance for the House to submit tgeir own.



Not the person you replied to, but there are different narratives for it:

"Democrats didn't want it because their insurance company sponsors didn't want it."

"Democrats didn't fight for it because they needed votes from a few people who wouldn't support it."

I'm partial to the view that they could have motivated those few senators to vote for a public option if they tried. Democrats wave their hands too much on the viability of progressive policy for my taste. Whether the belief in that unviability is genuine or a smokescreen is uncertain.


I remember Lieberman and Baucus derailing the effort. And Obama didn’t have the courage to pound the table back then.


It could have been passed through reconciliation IIRC. They didn't, in a bid to insulate the final bill against GOP objections to the legislation as a whole.

We all know how that turned out.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: