Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Perhaps they can't get statistical significance. You'd ballpark a 0.5% infection rate in the Bay Area going by deaths and current best guesses for IFR. Your false positive rate might exceed that.

These tests are better done in highly infected areas like NYC.



> current best guesses for IFR

The entire point of the study is that we don't have good estimates of the IFR.


We have randomized PCR studies and ships where everyone got tested. Yes, there is error there (false negatives), but there's an upper bound to how much there can be.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: