It's hard to be an Austrian and a decent human being. Moral hazard is real, but it's hard to stand by and watch humans suffer in a world full of abundance.
> It's hard to be an Austrian and a decent human being. Moral hazard is real, but it's hard to stand by and watch humans suffer in a world full of abundance.
Pardon the negativity, but this is a childish way to disagree with someone. Very few people think "I don't care what happens to people", mostly simply think there are better ways to do the most good. A person's inability to understand someone else's morality doesn't make that person superior, it makes them arrogant and ignorant.
It's much better to "steel man" a point of view, find the strengths in its arguments and understand it, then argue against those rather than just dismissing it out of hand because it doesn't align with your presuppositions.
Nothing is stopping all of the people who feel that wealth redistribution is required to be "a decent human being" from contributing voluntarily to charity. You're not being magnanimous by demanding that somebody else do something.
EDIT: and further, you're adopting the air of moral superiority while happily hurting people who haven't even been born yet.