Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

One wonders if they were auditing the numbers of actual registered voters vs those actually voting and came up with numbers that were wonky.

https://twitter.com/JTHVerhovek/status/1224550235881517056?s...

So who is now in possession of the paper records and how easy would it be to manipulate those records?



https://twitter.com/JuddLegum/status/1224697730058063872 you are amplifying conspiracy theories, whether you know it or not.

Anyone that's worked on a system with distributed state knows data consistency can be hard, particular in situations where the system comes under load and latencies begin to increase.

You're not specifically complaining about it, but I think it's interesting that they are being criticized for not being transparent, and then being criticized based on that transparency when they are.

This isn't without precedent, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2012_United_States_presidentia... (or https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/02/04/iowa-seco... for more narrative). Just 8 years ago in the Republican caucus in Iowa they changed the announced winner more than two weeks afterward.


People having been posting the paper caucus records left and right on Twitter and elsewhere. I wouldn't be surprised at this point the internet mob could count the results if someone tried to organize it.

Edit: Apparently all those paper sheets also have PIN numbers to log into the app, so that probably is a contributing issue.




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2025 batch! Applications are open till Aug 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: