Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Why didn’t they just use Google Docs. It’s bizarre to me that the Iowa Democratic Party is building any infrastructure at all.



They aren't, they are contracting it from a firm called Shadow Inc, who also seem to have sold the same app to the Nevada Democratic Party.


Shadow Inc sounds.. shady.


From their site:

"When a light is shining, Shadows are a constant companion. We see ourselves as building a long-term, side-by-side “Shadow” of tech infrastructure to the Democratic Party and the progressive community at large."

https://shadowinc.io/about


Imagine being on that development team looking at Feb 22 to get it fixed.


I mean, a google form would have done the job just fine right? It's insane to me that they decided to have this custom built instead.


Doesn't the Docs frontend have a hard limit at 50 concurrent editors?


Google Forms appends each form submission as a rows in a spreadsheet, and isn't limited that way.

Of course, some account has to own the spreadsheet and hence have write access. So it's not the ideal vote-tallying system.


Although all edits are logged...


Wouldn't this whole system be fine with a Google Form submitted to a Doc?


I wonder if you could get around that by giving groups of caucus precincts a five minute time slot?




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2025 batch! Applications are open till Aug 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: