> I am a theist because I believe that [we] derive ultimate meaning and hope from believing in something that is bigger than [us].
Wait a minute, you admit that you believe in something because it feels good? It sounds like you want to believe in God, but actually don't really. I'd like to test that, so please forgive the following troll.
God doesn't exist, and those who believe it does are wrong (yes, my belief is that strong).
Now, is your belief so strong that you feel the urge to respond something like "no you're wrong, God does exist"? I don't ask for evidence (the internet has plenty), just a yes or a no, followed by your estimated probability that God exists if you wish.
It seems just an incorrect reappropriation of “theism”, really.
I could make a similar argument, though without a religious undertone, about a belief in a greater-than-whole (or struggle for one, if that sounds better).
I agree. This is a dangerous sort of argument, to believe something - particularly something so core to human behavior - simply because it is convenient and satisfying.
In fact, this type of justification is at the root of many of the terrible things that have happened in the world - from slavery to genocide.
Are you a terrible person? Maybe not, but only because it doesn't feel right.
Wait a minute, you admit that you believe in something because it feels good? It sounds like you want to believe in God, but actually don't really. I'd like to test that, so please forgive the following troll.
God doesn't exist, and those who believe it does are wrong (yes, my belief is that strong).
Now, is your belief so strong that you feel the urge to respond something like "no you're wrong, God does exist"? I don't ask for evidence (the internet has plenty), just a yes or a no, followed by your estimated probability that God exists if you wish.