Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> This is really serious stuff.

Yes, we're in agreement on that. And "celebrating" gas is a million miles away from my perspective. Every reduction in CO2 emissions today saves lives not just today but a century from now.

Suppose we could instantaneously replace coal with natural gas, today. And we also have a choice of replacing all coal with low-carbon sources, but at some point in N years in the future. How long does it take to break even? 2N years in the future. So even assuming we could fully decarbonize the world economy in 25 years, it'd be a half century before we even get to the break even point in terms of accummulated emissions.

And that doesn't even account for a significant part of the carbon emissions from the first 25 years being absorbed by various processes, or the ability to simultaneously push for low carbon and natural gas energy. Even if natural gas pushes the timeline for full decarbonization from 25 to 35 years out, it's still a clear win.

That scenario I acknowledge is bleak, but bleak is better than... really fucking bleak, which is what we're headed for with coal.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: