Also in the United States, you usually do not own a copy of the software you used, you are merely licensed to use it and are subject to the terms of the EULA. Most EULAs expressly forbid reverse-engineering, decompilation, or modification. And yes, they are binding contracts; see Vernor v. Autodesk.
I have been wondering about this in regards to people claiming ownership of GPL code and wanting it removed despite priorly releasing said code under GPL what is the precedent there?