Good to know, but only if you have a choice of carriers. While I hate to drag the free market into this, having choice (read:competition) would expose this issue and be more likely to solve it.
Reminder: initiatives like Hyperboria (formerly Project Meshnet) exist. Using the cjdns protocol and some communications medium (e.g. wires, line-of-sight microwave, WLAN, IPoCP), you can become the ISP for your own local area, assigning IPv6 addresses and providing a bridge (or many) to the 'net at large.
The rebirth of Community Access TV(CATV). Some enterprising community member would set up an expensive and complicated antenna and split it out to all his neighbors. Those eventually become cable companies.
I kind of hope the next 'net is based on cjdns, because it's a much better protocol and it's fundamentally less centralised. If the new ISPs evolved from Hyperboria, it'd be a dream come true.
There are still some bugs, though (like the horizon issue limiting the usability of convoluted or large networks: https://github.com/cjdelisle/cjdns/blob/master/doc/bugs/hori...) but it's enough that people using the network don't really need to fix them, since everything still works.
If you want to help out with the code, it's probably best to look at the bugs repo (https://github.com/hyperboria/bugs/issues); the issues in the "bugs" directory of cjd's repo are mostly large, architectural issues and non-trivial flaws that are probably due to the implementation.
I'm one of the Yggdrasil developers, and FYI, the cjdns routing scheme is flawed and has severe scaling issues. It will, in all likeliness, be replaced with a variation of the Yggdrasil[1] routing scheme in future updates to the cjdns codebase and route servers.
The existing Hyperboria network already sees issues due to scale today and it's not even 1000 nodes.
Hopefully newer services such as SpaceX's StarLink will break the geographic monopolies or duopolies that have allowed these companies to profit so greatly off of such poor quality service.
Right but the end result of competition is that one company wins and eats the other, or they divide the market geographically, either way you end up back in the same place.
The alternative being what? Gov regulations? Where the companies manipulate the regs and have flat out abusive monopolies? As we have now? I don't see how more of the same is any sort of solution.
Can you truly have free markets in a decades-long timespan? Lobbying to rewrite laws seems like a given for large companies. Free market telecom doesn't seem like an equilibrium.