You are looking at that sentence too literally/technically. As a reader, I never considered it to mean "they remove novels when they don't like the story". Instead, from the tone, context (an internet discussion) and knowledge of how the list is likely to work, it seemed likely to me that the link would refer to one or more books being removed for political reasons.
The words OP used are not precise, but they aren't wrong either - they communicate how he feels about the incident in question.
You and the others should consider that the reason the Spiegel gave was a lie. There is quite a heavy motive for doing so: the book is on the other side of the political spectrum, considering where the Spiegel lies.
> The words OP used are not precise, but they aren't wrong either - they communicate how he feels about the incident in question.
I think that is actually a great summary, thx.
I guess my long conversation here is just an expression of my underlying impression that political discourse should in general focus more on facts than on feelings.
People seem to be more focused on how they feel about an issue than its actual contents. But this is getting of topic.
The words OP used are not precise, but they aren't wrong either - they communicate how he feels about the incident in question.