Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Why bother with the code? The value is with the existing links database, and since it belongs to the users, Yahoo shouldn't have the right to sell or distribute it freely.

Since users can already import/export their bookmarks, the only support Yahoo needs to provide is keeping the import API open for a little longer after the site is shut down. Of course this assumes that users would want to migrate their data to a replacement service.



Of course this assumes that users would want to migrate their data to a replacement service.

Or, for that matter, that users would share their tags with researchers who build on social tagging data:

http://groups.google.com/group/get-theinfo/browse_thread/thr...

Here is a (scraped?) delicious data set, for those who are interested: http://arvindn.livejournal.com/116137.html


Why would one want 10-days of bookmarks from 1.5 years ago?


Because they wanted to research how people's bookmarking activity corresponded to new information emerging concerning the 2009 flu pandemic http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2009_flu_pandemic


Unless I am mistaken here (as far as copyright goes, if that's what you're talking about) the only data Delicious' users can claim any right to is the short descriptions they are able to add to each bookmark. The mere fact that they liked that page is data that can be freely distributed.


Nah, the tags themselves is what he was getting at. Not saying I agree or disagree with him, but that's the value.


I actually forgot that Delicious was all about tags. It's been a long time since I visited the site.


The individual links can't be copyrighted, but a person's collection of links probably can.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_copyright_law#Com...




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: