Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

So you complain when it can't be modified, and then you complain when it can?

What exactly would make you happy?



I don't unerstand why you're being upvoted. See comment below.


apt-get upgrade all


That still normally requires admin rights.


on a corp network you schedule it


nodata was talking about home users.

I think apt-get shouldn't require admin rights for security updates.


Having the program be installed by root but not require admin rights to update, I presume. That sort of system is quite possible with services or scheduled tasks on Windows. In fact MSI can do that already as long as everything is signed.


Exactly this. Thanks.


The MSI offers a number of GPO switches so a domain admin can do things like disable auto-updates, disable extensions from being installed, black- or whitelist individual extensions, etc. You're commenting like you've never actually done this, which is probably why you're being downvoted.

By comparison, Chrome for Enterprise currently offers only about a dozen GPO switches and IE6 offers 1300, but the dozen they chose cover about 90% of possible use cases and the team is working on adding more all the time, as they are justified.




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2025 batch! Applications are open till Aug 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: