Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> but this is possibly the most important patent of the last 30 years

It is an interesting struggle to figure out what my objection to that point is. I think it is that we know exactly how hard it is to apply linear algebra to a problem - not everyone's cup of tea, but easily 10% of software engineers would be able to do it.

The truly groundbreaking part of Google was never the indexing - that was a problem that was going to get solved one way or another. The groundbreaking part is figuring out that search + low latency + advertising is a money printing machine and that tech favours the winner.

The mechanism to achieve search + low latency + advertising is important but to some degree unimpressive. If the other search engines at the time had realised the payoffs and how important latency was they'd have gone short text-only ads too and put more engineering time into the problem - maybe someone other than Google would be the search engine of the day.

And even if PageRank was the difference between Google and a hypothetical runner up, the difference of a better algorithm would be marginal. Decisive, but ultimately marginal.



Back then google loaded in a few seconds whilst the competition could take over a minute for the 99% of users who were on a 28.8k dial-up.

It's almost as if the people behind Lycos/Excite/Altavista were all using the internet via a T1 connection from their unis..


I think a big factor is that Google didn’t have to make any money and could keep their homepage as simple as possible.


Altavista was actually just a tech demo of their servers :)


And Google had connections to which large organizations from their start that gave them competitive advantage in multiple areas?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: