> It's pretty exciting stuff, and while what NASA is using is obviously more advanced than a $300 3d printer you can get online today, it's still using a lot of the same stuff and is pretty close to what you or I could print in our house if we wanted to.
Everything is correct except for this statement! From the video it looks like they are using an Ultimaker for some of these parts, which means you can get similar results even on a $200 Ender-3 (my go-to recommendation).
Everything is correct except for this statement! From the video it looks like they are using an Ultimaker for some of these parts, which means you can get similar results even on a $200 Ender-3 (my go-to recommendation).