>>When through the normal course of using a technology you reveal information to the government (in this case the military) they can use that information against you.
>That’s not the legal standard for searches and seizures under the 4th amendment.
Regardless of the location, a conversation is protected from unreasonable search and seizure under the Fourth Amendment if it is made with a "reasonable expectation of privacy".
The law is not and never was:
>When through the normal course of using a technology you reveal information to the government (in this case the military) they can use that information against you.
>That’s not the legal standard for searches and seizures under the 4th amendment.
Was Katz overruled?