> I know that it intends to meddle with the election. Like I said, that isn't inherently a bad thing.
Whether it is bad depends on intent IMHO.
If it is simply to give information for a better informed public that's one thing. If it's to selectively target a particular candidate to fuck them over, it is another.
Would the "journalist" in question release similar, potentially damaging information on other candidates?
Whether it is bad depends on intent IMHO.
If it is simply to give information for a better informed public that's one thing. If it's to selectively target a particular candidate to fuck them over, it is another.
Would the "journalist" in question release similar, potentially damaging information on other candidates?