Great writers have a firmly defined opinion, and make it well known through prose. There’s nothing worse than reading some milquetoast overview of an issue in the name of “fairness”. Not all problems have multiple valid points of view. Some things are either right or wrong, and it’s left to critics to pick a side.
Some things are indeed objective, and the author has failed utterly in pointing out any of the building's objective flaws.
Meanwhile, other things are inherently subjective, which means that by definition, there is no right or wrong answer. Treating an architect with contempt for purely subjective reasons, is not a mark of a "great writer" in any way.
