Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

As long as you're just replacing the fixture and not running new line a handy man type person can do it legally.



Generally, a landlord wants someone licensed with insurance to handle something like that on the off chance something goes wrong. I was going to fix the fixture in my bathroom that was shorting a bit and burning out bulbs myself. Thankfully I called my owner and he had an electrician come in because it turns out a lot of the conduit above the fixture needed replacing due to age.


People who do handyman work for a living can and should carry liability coverage.

example: https://www.progressivecommercial.com/business-insurance/han...


The majority of people doing handyman work without a contractor license are effectively judgment proof so liability coverage is kind of pointless.


Judgement proof typically means you have no money/assets to come after, so even if someone wins a judgement against you they aren't getting paid. That's why you ensure you hire a handyman with liability insurance, so that there's something (the insurance payout) to collect in the event of a problem. Do you mean something else by judgement proof?


In some jurisdictions.

IIRC, Australia requires an electrician for even this sort of minor work.


> As long as you're just replacing the fixture and not running new line a handy man type person can do it legally.

That likely depends on local codes; not sure about light fixtures specifically, but I definitely have encountered variations in different cities in the same county when it comes to ceiling fans.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: